Trump says the U.S. and Denmark reached a Greenland security deal that would expand the U.S. military presence while preserving Danish sovereignty.

Trump says Greenland deal is in place

A new chapter may be opening in the long-running dispute over Greenland.

U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that his administration has reached a security agreement with Denmark and Greenland. The deal would allow the United States to expand its military presence on the Arctic island.

Trump said the agreement gives Washington permanent control over Greenland’s security needs. He also said the U.S. would begin planning a larger military footprint on the mineral-rich territory.

However, the deal does not transfer Greenland to the United States.

Denmark says Greenland will remain sovereign

Denmark’s government offered a different emphasis.

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s office said the agreement recognizes Denmark’s sovereignty and Greenland’s territorial integrity. It also recognizes the right of Greenland’s people to decide their own future.

That point matters because Trump has spent months pushing for greater U.S. control over Greenland.

In the past, he called on Denmark to sell the island to the United States. He also refused to rule out military action to gain control of the territory.

Now, the proposed agreement would expand U.S. security access without changing Greenland’s formal status.

More U.S. military activity could follow

Trump said the United States would move quickly to expand its military presence.

Greenland already hosts a major U.S. military facility at Pituffik Space Base. The island also sits in a key Arctic location between North America and Europe.

As a result, Washington sees Greenland as important to its wider security plans.

Trump also said U.S. rivals would face limits on military bases and sensitive investments in Greenland unless Washington gives written approval.

The deal still needs approval

Despite Trump’s announcement, the agreement is not yet fully in force.

Denmark and Greenland are expected to sign the pact with the United States during next week’s United Nations General Assembly meetings.

However, both the Danish and Greenlandic parliaments must still approve the agreement.

So, while Trump has declared a deal, the final legal steps have yet to happen.

A major shift after months of tension

The announcement comes after a period of sharp tension between Washington, Copenhagen and Nuuk.

Denmark and Greenland have repeatedly said that Greenland is not for sale. They have also rejected efforts to change the island’s status without the consent of its people.

The new agreement could therefore mark a significant change in the dispute.

Instead of seeking formal ownership, the United States would gain a larger security role while Denmark and Greenland retain their sovereignty.

Why Greenland matters to the U.S.

Greenland is the world’s largest island and has major strategic value.

Its location gives it importance for Arctic defence, airspace monitoring and access between North America and Europe. In addition, Greenland has valuable mineral resources.

At the same time, the Arctic is becoming more important to several major powers, including the United States, Russia and China.

For Washington, a stronger military presence could therefore serve several security goals at once.

What happens next?

For now, the focus shifts to the formal agreement.

The three governments are expected to work toward signing the pact next week. After that, parliamentary approval in Denmark and Greenland will be needed before the agreement can take effect.

For Greenland, the key issue remains sovereignty and self-determination.

For the United States, the focus is on security and a larger military presence.

And for Denmark, the agreement offers a way to work with Washington while maintaining its stated position on Greenland’s territorial status.

The next few weeks should show whether the proposed deal becomes a lasting part of Arctic security policy.

Two Alberta boys, aged four and six, have been found safe in B.C. after an alleged abduction. Their mother and her partner face charges.

Two brothers found safe in British Columbia

Two young Alberta brothers are safe after police found them in British Columbia more than two months after they were allegedly taken from their home.

The boys, aged four and six, were found Thursday at a rural property in West Kelowna, B.C., according to the RCMP.

Thankfully, police say both children are in good health.

For now, the brothers remain with B.C. child protection services. They are expected to return to Alberta.

Amber Alert was issued in July

The case began in early July.

Police said the boys had been taken from Valhalla Centre, a small Alberta community about 63 kilometres northwest of Grande Prairie.

Soon after, authorities issued an Amber Alert to help locate the children.

Alerts were also issued in British Columbia and the Northwest Territories. However, those alerts were later cancelled as the investigation continued.

Meanwhile, RCMP officers kept working to locate the brothers and determine where they had been taken.

Mother and partner face charges

Police have now arrested the boys’ mother and her partner.

Both have been charged with contravening a custody order, the RCMP said.

The investigation remains ongoing.

The boys’ safe recovery brings an important development to a case that had stretched on for weeks. However, police have not released further details about the circumstances that led officers to the West Kelowna property.

B.C. Ferries cancelled several sailings Tuesday after mechanical problems hit vessels serving Swartz Bay, Tsawwassen and Gabriola Island.

Two Swartz Bay sailings cancelled

Travellers faced delays Tuesday after mechanical problems forced B.C. Ferries to cancel several sailings.

The first disruption involved the Queen of New Westminster. A problem with the ferry’s propulsion system led to two cancelled trips between Swartz Bay and Tsawwassen.

The 10 a.m. sailing from Tsawwassen was cancelled. So was the noon sailing from Swartz Bay.

As a result, some passengers had to change their travel plans.

B.C. Ferries said its Customer Service Centre was contacting affected passengers. Staff were checking whether travellers could move to another Tuesday sailing.

However, some bookings could not be moved. In those cases, the ferry operator said fares and fees would be refunded.

Gabriola Island service also hit

Meanwhile, another ferry problem caused more trouble for travellers between Nanaimo Harbour and Gabriola Island.

The Island sarelquun had a propulsion-system issue. That led to four cancelled sailings.

From Nanaimo Harbour, the 11:50 a.m. and 1:45 p.m. trips were cancelled.

From Descanso Bay on Gabriola Island, the 1:10 p.m. and 2:20 p.m. trips were also cancelled.

More cancellations were possible

B.C. Ferries warned that further cancellations were possible as crews dealt with the mechanical problems.

Therefore, travellers planning to sail Tuesday were urged to check their sailing status before heading to the terminal.

For passengers already booked on a cancelled trip, B.C. Ferries said customer service staff would provide information about available options.

The disruptions affected two key Vancouver Island routes. However, the operator said passengers whose bookings were cancelled would receive refunds of applicable fares and fees.

Newly unsealed court documents allege a Toronto cop planned illegal cannabis shops and erotic massage parlours as part of Project South.

New court documents have added another startling detail to Ontario’s sweeping Project South investigation.

A Toronto police officer allegedly helped plan illegal cannabis dispensaries and erotic massage parlours in the city. According to newly unsealed documents, the alleged plan also involved protecting those businesses from police and bylaw enforcement.

The allegations form part of a much larger investigation into suspected corruption, organized crime and other serious offences.

Officer allegedly had a key role

Toronto police Const. Timothy Barnhardt is among 27 people charged in Project South.

Eight of those suspects are current or former police officers.

According to the documents, Barnhardt allegedly helped identify locations for illegal cannabis shops and massage businesses. He also allegedly agreed to help keep those locations away from enforcement action.

Investigators say the plan included giving businesses advance warning about inspections.

The documents also allege that cash bribes could have been arranged for police and bylaw officers. In addition, investigators say police databases could have been used to shield the businesses.

Alleged plan went beyond finding locations

The documents suggest the alleged operation involved several people.

Barnhardt and Brian Da Costa are identified by investigators as key figures. Several other accused people are also named in the material.

However, the allegations have not been proven in court.

Barnhardt’s lawyer declined to comment on the latest allegations. Da Costa’s lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment, according to The Canadian Press.

Project South began with a different investigation

Project South did not start as an investigation into illegal cannabis stores.

Instead, York Regional Police began looking into an alleged attempt to harm an Ontario correctional worker.

As investigators followed that case, they say they uncovered possible links to police officers and organized crime.

Then, the investigation widened.

Police eventually announced dozens of charges in February 2026. Those charges included allegations involving bribery, drug trafficking and conspiracy to commit murder.

Newly unsealed documents shed more light

The latest details come from information-to-obtain documents, commonly called ITOs.

Police submit these documents when they seek search warrants. They explain the evidence investigators say supports a warrant request.

However, an ITO does not prove the allegations inside it.

The court has released more of the documents after media organizations challenged publication restrictions. At the same time, some material remains covered by a publication ban.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Laura Bird said greater public access was important while also recognizing the need to protect the accused’s right to a fair trial.

Police databases are also part of the allegations

The documents raise another concern: the alleged misuse of police information.

Investigators say Barnhardt provided confidential information to Da Costa. They further allege that some of that information was connected to other criminal activity.

Earlier evidence released in the case also described police database searches involving people connected to the wider investigation.

Those allegations remain before the courts and have not been tested at trial.

What happens next?

For now, the Project South allegations remain just that — allegations.

The newly released documents provide investigators’ account of what they believed was happening when they sought search warrants. They do not establish guilt.

Meanwhile, more material could emerge as court proceedings continue and additional documents are considered for release.

The case also raises broader questions about police oversight, access to confidential databases and how suspected corruption can go undetected.

For Toronto residents, however, one thing is clear: Project South has grown far beyond its original investigation, with newly unsealed records offering a deeper look at the allegations surrounding the case.

A Surrey man faces 22 charges after four shootings, including three attacks on one home and a fourth that injured a man in Cloverdale.

Surrey man charged in four shootings

A 37-year-old Surrey man now faces 22 charges after police linked him to four shootings across the city.

The Surrey Police Service announced the charges Friday against Marco Matias, who investigators say targeted the same Guildford home three times in December 2025.

Police also connected Matias to a fourth shooting in Cloverdale last month. That incident left one man with minor injuries.

Three shootings hit the same Surrey home

Police first responded to a home near 110 Avenue and 140 Street on Dec. 7, 2025.

Investigators found that someone had fired shots at the residence in what appeared to be a drive-by shooting.

However, the incident did not end there.

Police returned to the same home twice more that month after more shots were fired.

Fortunately, no one suffered injuries in any of the three attacks.

Investigators described the shootings as targeted. At the same time, police said they were not connected to extortion or the ongoing B.C. gang conflict.

Firearm charges tied to December attacks

Court records show Matias faces three counts of several firearm-related offences tied to the December shootings.

Those charges include:

• Reckless discharge of a firearm
• Possession of an unauthorized firearm
• Unauthorized possession of a firearm in a motor vehicle
• Possession of a firearm contrary to an order

He faces three counts of each of those offences in connection with the three December incidents.

Fourth shooting injured a man

Eight months later, police responded to another shooting.

Officers were called early on Aug. 12 to a home near 60 Avenue and 177 Street in the Cloverdale neighbourhood.

Two people were targeted during the incident. One person suffered minor injuries.

Police later linked Matias to the shooting.

As a result, he faces 10 more charges related to that case. The charges include two counts of discharging a firearm and one count of aggravated assault, along with several other firearm offences.

Matias remains in custody

Matias remains in police custody while the case moves through court.

His next court appearance is scheduled for Sept. 16.

The charges have not been proven in court. Matias is presumed innocent unless and until a court finds otherwise.

Canada relies heavily on foreign tech firms. Here’s why digital sovereignty matters, what it means for our data and what Ottawa is doing about it.

Canada’s data may be closer to foreign hands than you think

What happens to Canadian data when it runs through technology owned by companies outside Canada?

That question is becoming harder to ignore.

Canada depends on major foreign technology providers for cloud services, software and digital infrastructure. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is pushing that dependence even further.

So, a bigger question is emerging: Can Canada truly control its digital future if much of its technology sits outside Canadian hands?

That is the heart of the growing debate over digital sovereignty.

So, what does digital sovereignty mean?

Put simply, digital sovereignty means having the power to control and protect your own digital systems, data and technology.

It goes beyond where a file is stored.

Canada also needs to know who can access that data, who runs the systems behind it and what happens if a foreign supplier changes its rules.

The federal government says digital sovereignty covers data, operations and technology. It also says complete digital independence is not realistic because modern technology is deeply connected across borders.

In other words, Canada does not need to build every piece of technology itself.

However, it does need enough control to make its own choices.

Why foreign tech dependence matters

Many of the world’s biggest cloud and technology companies are based outside Canada.

That brings clear benefits. These companies offer powerful tools, huge computing capacity and services that can be hard to build from scratch.

But there is a trade-off.

If Canada becomes too dependent on a small number of foreign suppliers, it could face higher costs, fewer choices and greater risks during a political or commercial dispute.

There is also the question of foreign laws.

A company may operate in Canada while also facing legal duties in another country. That can create difficult questions about who may seek access to data and under what rules.

The issue becomes even more important when the information involves government services, national security or sensitive personal data.

AI is raising the stakes

Artificial intelligence has added a new layer to the debate.

AI systems need data, computing power and large digital platforms. As Canada expands its use of AI, reliance on foreign infrastructure could grow too.

That is why Ottawa has been looking at ways to build more Canadian capacity.

The federal government says it wants to support Canadian technology, diversify suppliers and explore sovereign cloud and AI services. It has also said it plans to develop a made-in-Canada AI platform for government use.

This does not mean Canada is trying to shut out foreign technology.

Instead, the goal is to have more choices.

Canada is looking for more control

Shared Services Canada has been working on a range of measures aimed at strengthening Canada’s digital independence.

For example, the government has been exploring sovereign cloud services that would prioritize Canadian-owned and controlled providers.

It is also investing in Canadian technology capacity and looking at ways to reduce dependence on a small group of suppliers.

Sensitive government information already faces rules around where it should be stored and handled.

Under federal digital policy, departments are expected to prioritize computing facilities in Canada for sensitive information such as Protected B, Protected C and classified data.

Still, keeping data in Canada is only part of the solution.

Location is not the whole story

A Canadian data centre does not automatically mean Canadian control.

The company running the technology matters too.

So does the software.

So does access.

And so does the ability to move the data or services elsewhere if a supplier becomes unavailable.

That is why the federal government’s framework looks at more than data storage. It also considers legal rules, supply chains, security, privacy, workforce skills and operational resilience.

The goal is not digital isolation

There is a common misunderstanding about digital sovereignty.

It does not necessarily mean Canada should build a completely separate internet.

That would be unrealistic.

Canada’s economy depends on global technology and international connections. Businesses, universities, governments and consumers all rely on services that cross borders every day.

Instead, digital sovereignty is about having enough control and resilience to avoid being trapped.

That means having alternatives.

It means keeping critical skills in Canada.

It means reducing dangerous dependencies.

And, above all, it means making sure Canadians can still make important digital decisions for themselves.

Why this matters to everyday Canadians

The issue may sound like something for government officials and technology experts.

It is not.

Digital infrastructure touches almost every part of daily life.

Banking. Health services. Government records. Business systems. Communications. AI tools.

If those systems fail, change suddenly or become subject to rules outside Canada’s control, Canadians could feel the effects quickly.

That is why digital sovereignty is becoming a broader economic and national-security issue.

Canada faces a difficult balancing act

Building more Canadian technology will cost money.

It will also take time.

Foreign technology providers already offer services at enormous scale. Canadian companies cannot simply replace that infrastructure overnight.

At the same time, doing nothing could leave Canada increasingly dependent on decisions made elsewhere.

The answer, therefore, is likely to be balance.

Canada can continue using global technology while building stronger domestic alternatives.

It can work with foreign companies while protecting sensitive information.

And it can embrace AI while ensuring that Canadians retain meaningful control over the systems that support it.

The bigger question: who controls Canada’s digital future?

Canada’s digital sovereignty debate is ultimately about power.

Who controls the infrastructure?

Who controls the data?

Who can access it?

And who gets to make the final decision when Canadian interests clash with those of a foreign company or government?

There are no easy answers.

However, one thing is becoming clear: digital sovereignty is no longer just a technology issue.

It is becoming part of Canada’s conversation about security, economic independence and national control.

And as AI becomes more deeply woven into Canadian life, that conversation is likely to become even more important.

A Melfort RCMP officer won’t face charges after a woman’s arm was broken during a mental-health arrest. SIRT raised concerns about the force used.

An RCMP officer who broke a Saskatchewan hospital patient’s arm during an arrest will not face charges, despite a police watchdog finding grounds for assault.

RCMP officer will not be charged

A Saskatchewan RCMP officer who broke a woman’s arm during a hospital arrest will not face criminal charges.

The decision comes despite the province’s Serious Incident Response Team, or SIRT, finding reasonable grounds to believe the officer committed assault causing bodily harm.

The incident happened outside Melfort Hospital in July 2025.

However, Saskatchewan’s Public Prosecutions office has decided there is not enough evidence to support a conviction.

Woman’s arm broke during arrest

According to the SIRT report, Melfort RCMP were called to the hospital on July 2, 2025.

The 38-year-old woman was receiving mental health care. She had left the hospital despite medical advice.

An RCMP officer arrived and tried to arrest her under the Mental Health Services Act.

A struggle then began in the hospital parking lot.

During the struggle, the officer placed pressure on the woman’s right arm. The arm was already handcuffed.

The report says the arm then broke with an audible sound and became visibly displaced.

The woman was later taken back into the hospital for treatment.

Watchdog raised concerns over force

SIRT reviewed body-camera footage, parking lot surveillance video and witness statements.

The review also included a written statement from the officer. He agreed to speak with investigators.

The report says the woman ran from the officer and swung her arm at his head. Her arm hit him and knocked off his hat.

The officer then tackled her.

Video and witness accounts also showed the officer repeatedly demanding that she give him her hands.

At one point, he struck her in the head with his fist. He then told her she was under arrest for assaulting a police officer.

The officer handcuffed her right wrist. He then applied pressure to the same arm.

That was when the woman’s arm fractured.

SIRT points to “significant issues”

SIRT said police can use force when it is reasonably necessary to carry out their duties.

However, investigators found concerns about how the officer handled the arrest.

The report points to the officer’s apparent anger during the confrontation.

It also highlights his decision to apply pressure to an arm that was already handcuffed.

SIRT said those factors raised “significant issues” about the level of force used.

The woman later tested positive for substances including cocaine and methamphetamine, according to the report.

Crown says conviction was unlikely

Despite SIRT’s findings, the Crown decided not to proceed with charges.

Noel Busse, a spokesperson for Saskatchewan’s Ministry of Justice and Attorney General, said prosecutors must use a different test when deciding whether criminal charges should be laid.

The Crown must consider whether the available evidence can support a conviction in court.

It must also consider possible legal defences, including the Criminal Code rules around reasonable police force.

After reviewing the evidence, prosecutors concluded there was no reasonable likelihood of conviction.

As a result, no criminal charge will be laid against the officer.

RCMP review could follow

The case is not necessarily finished from a disciplinary standpoint.

SIRT said its report will be sent to the RCMP and the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP.

Those bodies can review the officer’s conduct and consider whether discipline is appropriate under the RCMP Code of Conduct.

So, while the officer will not face a criminal charge, the incident may still lead to further review.

The case also highlights the difficult line police must navigate when using force during mental health-related calls.

For now, Saskatchewan prosecutors have concluded that the evidence does not meet the threshold needed for a criminal conviction.