US President Says He ‘Won’t Use Force’ to Acquire Greenland
The U.S. president said he will not use military force to acquire Greenland.
He made the statement while speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
His remarks followed days of global outrage.
Several leaders criticized earlier comments about Greenland’s future.
The president insisted that his approach would remain peaceful.
He said any discussion must happen through dialogue.
Greenland’s Strategic Importance Highlighted
The U.S. president described Greenland as strategically important.
He pointed to its location in the Arctic region.
The Arctic has growing military and economic significance.
Major powers have increased their presence there.
The president said the U.S. has long-term security interests.
He argued that Greenland plays a role in global defence.
European Leaders Reject Any Pressure
European leaders strongly rejected the idea of acquisition.
They stressed that Greenland’s future is not negotiable.
Denmark reaffirmed its sovereignty over the territory.
Officials said Greenlanders alone can decide their destiny.
Leaders warned against economic or political pressure.
They emphasized respect for international law.
Tariffs and Diplomatic Fallout
The president also addressed trade tensions with Europe.
He defended tariffs imposed during recent disputes.
European officials said such measures harm alliances.
They warned of damage to transatlantic relations.
Several NATO members expressed concern.
They said unity is critical amid global instability.
NATO and Arctic Security Concerns
The president reaffirmed commitment to NATO.
He said collective defence remains important.
Allies stressed cooperation over unilateral action.
They urged calm dialogue on Arctic security.
Greenland’s position makes it vital for surveillance.
It also plays a role in missile defence systems.
A Message Meant to Reassure
By ruling out force, the president sought to reassure allies.
However, uncertainty remains over future intentions.
The comments eased immediate tensions.
Yet concerns about diplomatic pressure persist.
The issue has become a symbol of wider global shifts.
It reflects rising competition in strategic regions.
