Tamara Lich may face 7 years in prison for her role in the 2022 Freedom Convoy. Critics call the Crown’s sentencing demand excessive and politically charged.
Crown’s Sentencing Demand Sparks Outcry in High-Profile Protest Case
Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, key organizers of the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest, could face prison sentences of seven and eight years, respectively, as Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey prepares to deliver their sentence this week. The Crown’s demand has ignited widespread debate, with critics calling the punishment disproportionate and politically motivated.
Organizers Found Guilty of Mischief, Acquitted on Most Charges
The duo was found guilty of mischief and, in Barber’s case, counselling others to disobey a court order to stop horn honking. However, both were acquitted of the majority of the original charges, which included obstruction, intimidation, and counselling others to commit unlawful acts. The verdict followed a 45-day trial stemming from their involvement in a protest that paralyzed downtown Ottawa for three weeks in early 2022.
Judge Recognizes Protest Intent, But Highlights Public Harm
In her April 3 ruling, Justice Perkins-McVey acknowledged that Lich and Barber came to Ottawa with what she described as “noble intentions,” aiming to protest federal COVID-19 mandates. However, she emphasized that the protest significantly disrupted the lives of downtown residents, blocking streets, impeding access to homes and businesses, and causing psychological and emotional stress.
Legal Tensions Between Rights and Responsibilities
The case has underscored a constitutional grey zone between the right to peaceful protest and the rights of citizens to live without undue disruption. In her judgment, the judge cited that even Charter-protected freedoms are not absolute. “Society expects demonstrators to exercise their rights without infringing on others,” she said, highlighting the tension between freedom of expression and public order.
Uneven Legal Response Fuels Public Frustration
Critics of the Crown’s sentencing proposal argue that similar disruptive protests—such as ongoing anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian demonstrations since late 2023—have caused repeated public nuisance without triggering comparable criminal penalties. This disparity is feeding public skepticism over whether the justice system is applying laws evenly and without bias.
Sentencing Looms Amid Concerns Over Retribution
The Crown’s call for long-term imprisonment has been widely criticized as retributive rather than restorative. Tamara Lich, who shared the sentencing proposal on social media, has become a symbol for supporters of civil liberties and protest rights. Legal experts warn that such severe penalties could set a troubling precedent for future protest-related convictions in Canada.
After more than three years since the initial arrests, sentencing is expected imminently. Legal observers and Canadians across the political spectrum await Justice Perkins-McVey’s final decision, which could redefine the boundaries of lawful protest in the country.
For continuous coverage and real-time updates, keep following Maple News Wire.
