Elon Musk exits Trump’s administration after 129 controversial days slashing federal spending, reshaping policy, and stirring global and political tension.
Musk Departs After a Disruptive White House Stint
A Short But Powerful Tenure
Elon Musk’s time in the Trump administration officially ends Friday, following a high-profile, 129-day stint as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). Appointed as a “special government employee,” the billionaire entrepreneur was tasked with slashing government spending and injecting private-sector urgency into Washington bureaucracy. Despite the brevity of his role, Musk’s influence reverberated across domestic and global policy.
Massive Cuts, Controversial Methods
Trillions Targeted, Billions Claimed
Musk entered the role with an ambitious goal of cutting up to $2 trillion in federal costs. Although that figure was later revised to $150 billion, Doge reported savings of $175 billion through workforce reductions, canceled grants, regulatory rollbacks, and asset sales. However, independent reviews—such as a BBC analysis—questioned the validity of those numbers, citing incomplete or unverifiable data. In several cases, courts halted Musk-led mass firings, citing due process violations, including a failed attempt to downsize the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Ethical Questions Linger Over Dual Roles
Business-Government Overlap Raises Red Flags
Musk’s White House involvement drew scrutiny due to his leadership roles in companies like SpaceX and Tesla—both major federal contractors. While critics, particularly among Democrats, alleged conflicts of interest and accused Musk of using his position to benefit ventures like Starlink, the administration dismissed these concerns. Nevertheless, government endorsement of Musk’s businesses, including showcasing Tesla vehicles on the White House lawn, fueled ongoing ethical debates.
Isolationist Policies Accelerated
Foreign Aid Decimated by Efficiency Push
Internationally, Musk’s influence was sharply felt through deep cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which lost over 80% of its programs. The reductions aligned with Trump’s “America First” stance but crippled initiatives supporting education, healthcare, and food security in countries like Sudan, Afghanistan, and India. Experts warn the cuts diminished U.S. soft power abroad, weakening longstanding diplomatic and humanitarian efforts.
Misinformation in Government Circles
Conspiracies Elevated to Policy Talks
Musk’s controversial online persona followed him into government, as he promoted conspiracy theories—including unsubstantiated claims that U.S. gold reserves had vanished. In May, tensions flared when Musk and Trump presented discredited reports of Afrikaner “genocide” to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during an Oval Office meeting. Critics say these episodes highlight how misinformation has permeated even the highest levels of U.S. governance.
Internal Tensions Behind the Scenes
Cabinet Divisions Surface Over Musk’s Role
Despite Trump’s public support, Musk’s aggressive budget slashing caused friction within the administration. Cabinet members reportedly pushed back against Doge’s sweeping measures, though none publicly opposed Musk. His departure coincides with his criticism of Trump’s new “big, beautiful” budget bill, which increases defense spending and introduces massive tax cuts—moves Musk argues undermine Doge’s core mission. The comments underscore ongoing Republican rifts over fiscal strategy.
What’s Next?
A Lingering Influence Despite Exit
Though Musk exited his formal government role, Trump signaled continued collaboration, stating, “He will, always, be with us.” Whether through informal influence or future reappointment, Musk’s legacy as a disruptor in federal governance seems far from over. As the Trump administration continues to reshape government under a populist lens, Musk’s brief tenure may prove a defining chapter in the fusion of tech, business, and politics.