The U.S. MAHA health report is under fire for citing studies that don’t exist, sparking concerns about its credibility and future policy impact.
MAHA Health Report Under Fire for Citation Errors
The U.S. government’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) report, led by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is facing growing criticism after media investigations revealed that several cited studies do not exist or were misrepresented. This controversy comes amid a week of significant vaccine policy announcements that have already drawn questions from public health experts.
Nonexistent Studies and Misused Research
NOTUS, a digital news outlet, first reported that at least seven of the more than 500 studies cited in the MAHA report could not be found in any academic database or publication. Some researchers named in the report, such as Columbia University’s Katherine Keyes and Virginia Commonwealth University’s Robert L. Findling, stated they had not authored the studies attributed to them. In several cases, the report also misinterpreted existing research, drawing conclusions that the original authors say are inaccurate.
White House Response and AI Concerns
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the “formatting issues” and promised that the report would be updated. However, she did not clarify whether artificial intelligence was used to generate parts of the 72-page document—a question raised after patterns of AI-generated errors were identified by journalists. Despite the errors, the White House maintains “complete confidence” in Kennedy and claims the report’s core substance remains unchanged.
Impact on Health Policy and Public Trust
The MAHA report is intended to guide future health policy, with the White House requesting a $500 million boost in funding for related initiatives. However, the credibility of the report has been called into question by public health officials, with some experts suggesting it should be discarded entirely until its sources and findings can be verified. The controversy comes at a sensitive time, following announcements about changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations that have already been contradicted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
What’s Next?
A revised version of the MAHA report is expected, but the episode has highlighted the importance of accurate citations and transparency in government health documents. As the debate continues, Canadian viewers and policymakers are watching closely, recognizing the global impact of U.S. health policy decisions.
For continuous coverage and real-time updates, keep following Maple News Wire.
