Three NDP MPs criticize the party’s interim leader selection, citing lack of transparency and consultation after historic election losses.
Dissent Grows Within NDP Over Interim Leader Appointment
A Surprise Choice Sparks Internal Criticism
A fresh wave of dissent has emerged within the New Democratic Party (NDP) as three sitting MPs publicly criticized the party’s process for selecting its interim leader. The controversy follows the appointment of veteran Vancouver MP Don Davies, named interim leader after Jagmeet Singh’s resignation in the wake of the party’s worst electoral defeat in decades.
MPs Voice Concerns Over Transparency
Leah Gazan (Manitoba), Lori Idlout (Nunavut), and Jenny Kwan (British Columbia) sent a letter to the party’s executive and national council, expressing that they felt “excluded in the process.” The MPs argued that the caucus was not properly consulted, as required by the party’s constitution. “Selecting an interim leader in this fashion sets them up for failure, not success,” their letter stated, emphasizing the need for a transparent and democratic approach-especially after such a significant loss.
Party Constitution and Disputed Consultations
According to NDP rules, the national council is responsible for appointing an interim leader, but must consult with the caucus. The three MPs claim that while they had individual conversations with party president Mary Shortall, these did not amount to the formal consultation expected. They also noted that their suggestions for an open process, including allowing interested MPs to present their vision, were ignored.
Leadership Turmoil Amid Historic Losses
The NDP’s representation in the House of Commons plummeted from 24 to just seven seats after the recent election, resulting in the loss of official party status. Jagmeet Singh himself finished third in his riding, prompting his resignation and the urgent need for interim leadership.
Calls for Caucus Ratification
In their letter, the MPs urged that the interim leader be ratified by a two-thirds caucus vote, even though this step is not mandated by the party’s constitution. “We remain open to the selection of any of our colleagues as interim leader, including MP Davies. We simply insist that the process be transparent and allow for more caucus deliberation,” they wrote.
Party Leadership Responds
Party officials maintain that the process followed constitutional guidelines. National director Lucy Watson stated, “Our caucus members bring diverse experiences and are united in the urgent need to reconnect with working people and renew our commitment to deliver for people across the country.” Some party insiders, however, dismissed the MPs’ objections as a distraction from more pressing issues facing the NDP.
What’s Next for the NDP?
With the party at a crossroads, the selection of an interim leader has exposed deeper questions about internal democracy and the path forward after a historic setback. As the NDP prepares for a full leadership contest, the debate over process and transparency is likely to shape its efforts to rebuild and reconnect with Canadian voters.
